[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SPAM] [obm-l] Patologia topologica
- To: obm-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [SPAM] [obm-l] Patologia topologica
- From: albert <arcguede@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:15:49 -0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=HSqGYCu5fSbolh5WRbtDZowrbvSnF14tI7qMYUV0oSA=; b=FB/qQMguoH6Z2Rfz1/hrP5+dx3sjrZBKEgyIEH2vv2gzD4lhe9dPajNnB5NjeWi3GPrKvDG7awAUMxRvetEuZ1b55sfmW3Ie+WlDUADAeJaD/wyIEP/i5kDQcc/VHKoy3K/0nNr3noLHSBORAkNFBap5kpTLff3y6BUGgI5faGk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=qsNUjZE6XOUn7zLOkV5gST4ro1rZGLwt59Gi0kkPupTxq7utgAp5+d3mdGNBRCd7bQger7qNN9x8/z9zMB/b4IOUPjqoQ3ZPYbrxerAMQm9CSlsE7HKmGcsjVI0Z2WNkchgJ0wFqGrHVorLrSdbsF1YbgRlVmpVuwWH8zTM80aY=
- Reply-to: obm-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-obm-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)
SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.30 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: USER_AGENT (-0.5 points) Found a User-Agent header
SPAM: X_MAILING_LIST (-0.3 points) Found a X-Mailing-List header
SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 (0.8 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low)
SPAM: RCVD_IN_ORBS (2.2 points) RBL: Received via a relay in orbs.dorkslayers.com
SPAM: [RBL check: found 242.132.85.209.orbs.dorkslayers.com., type: 68.178.232.99]
SPAM: RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.4 points) RBL: Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com
SPAM: [RBL check: found 242.132.85.209.relays.osirusoft.com.]
SPAM: X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY (2.7 points) RBL: DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Open Relay
SPAM:
SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
Na definição de topologia temos que dado um conjunto X, X e o conjunto
nulo O pertencem ao conjunto das partes de X, o conjunto P={t_k} tal que
t_k pertence a X.
Alguém conhece algum conjunto X que não pertença a P ?
Por quê tenho pra mim que se X não faz parte do conjunto de suas partes,
então X não pertence a si mesmo, e se não existe tal conjunto, então
este requisito da topologia é uma coisa redundante.
=========================================================================
Instruções para entrar na lista, sair da lista e usar a lista em
http://www.mat.puc-rio.br/~obmlistas/obm-l.html
=========================================================================