Re: [obm-l] Questaunzinha chata!!!

To: obm-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [obm-l] Questaunzinha chata!!!
From: "Camilo Damiao" <thoraldtrue@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:02:59 -0300
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=YSEDsREH+Wk7bbGqs/4NyKn/afkV5euNh7+q23/pCqWLTUhWPHlOXX/YOPyOAMDo+ckIDapld7cS4clLIr4qSpcfwi8qZ0ae2+caB2BiXkqKZDsXKMWddSszSE7YeAAM26m0z6OB+dR/h9KCwNKy0RLlHGNuBmwhdawDkKoVpLk=
In-Reply-To: <99886d920604251449s5b46fb22g2b204c28c3398ba4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e2fbad610604251429s6c2ebde0v4f24d8fbb90923e@mail.gmail.com> <99886d920604251449s5b46fb22g2b204c28c3398ba4@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: obm-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-obm-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Eh issu msm... provar q (3,4) eh unica soluçaum do sistema...bem se fosse isso q vc me falou, seria um tanto obvio...

Obrigado pela observaçaum!

References:
- [obm-l] Questaunzinha chata!!!
  - From: Camilo Damiao
- Re: [obm-l] Questaunzinha chata!!!
  - From: Bruno França dos Reis